1 Introduction

The human-animal bond refers to the deep, emotional connection that exists between humans and their animal companions. This bond has been recognized and valued throughout history, with evidence suggesting that it plays a significant role in the emotional and physical well-being of both humans and animals. The relationship between humans and animals has evolved from one of economic necessity to one of companionship and mutual support. This bond is characterized by mutual attunement, where both human and animal respond to each other's emotional states, fostering a safe and responsive environment for inner growth (Creagan et al., 2015).

Surgical recovery in pets is a delicate and multifaceted process that requires careful management to ensure successful outcomes. The recovery period involves not only physical healing but also emotional and psychological adjustments for the pet. Key aspects of post-operative care include pain management, wound care, mobility support, and monitoring for any signs of complications such as infections or adverse reactions to medications. In addition to these medical considerations, the pet's emotional state during recovery is crucial. Stress, anxiety, and discomfort can hinder the healing process, potentially leading to prolonged recovery times or even complications. In the field of veterinary medicine, the human-animal bond is increasingly recognized for its therapeutic potential (Walsh, 2009; Borgi and Cirulli, 2016). Veterinary professionals are now exploring the implications of this bond in clinical practice, recognizing its potential to improve surgical recovery and overall well-being in pets (Gee et al., 2017; Overgaauw et al., 2020).

This study examines the impact of the human-animal bond on surgical recovery in pets, focusing on how the emotional and physical connection between pets and their owners influences postoperative outcomes. By synthesizing peer-reviewed literature, it aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of factors that enhance recovery, such as reduced stress levels in pets, improved adherence to postoperative care instructions, and the physiological benefits of positive interactions with owners. The research also explores how owner involvement, emotional support, and consistent care routines contribute to the healing process, while highlighting the influence of owner attitudes and behaviors on recovery outcomes. By shedding light on the role of this bond, the study seeks to inspire further research and inform veterinary practices to optimize surgical outcomes and improve the overall quality of care for pets.

2 The Human-Animal Bond: Definition and Components

2.1 Defining the human-animal bond

The human-animal bond is a multifaceted relationship that encompasses emotional, psychological, and physical connections between humans and animals. This bond has been recognized throughout history and across various cultures, evolving from a primarily economic relationship to one of companionship and mutual support. The American Veterinary Medical Association defines the human-animal bond as a relationship that maximizes the potential benefits for both humans and animals, emphasizing the importance of emotional and behavioral aspects alongside physical health (Creagan et al., 2015).

2.2 Emotional, psychological, and physical aspects of the bond

The human-animal bond significantly impacts the emotional, psychological, and physical well-being of both humans and animals. Emotionally, pets provide companionship, reduce feelings of loneliness, and enhance overall mental health. Psychologically, interactions with animals can reduce stress, anxiety, and depression, contributing to improved mental health outcomes. Physically, pet ownership has been associated with various health benefits, including better cardiovascular health, reduced risk of heart disease, and improved recovery from illnesses such as myocardial infarction (Beck, 2014).

Moreover, the bond can influence behavioral and emotional responses in animals, which is crucial for their welfare and the success of medical and surgical interventions. Veterinary surgeons play a vital role in nurturing this bond by addressing both the physical and emotional needs of animals, ensuring comprehensive care that promotes overall well-being (Shepherd, 2008).

2.3 Evolution of the human-animal bond over time

The human-animal bond has evolved significantly over time. Initially, animals were primarily valued for their economic contributions, such as providing labor, food, and other resources. However, as cultural landscapes changed, the role of animals shifted towards companionship and emotional support. This transition has been accompanied by growing recognition of the therapeutic benefits of human-animal interactions, leading to the development of animal-assisted therapies and interventions in various settings, including hospitals, eldercare, and community programs (Wells, 2019; Ratschen et al., 2020).

Research has highlighted the profound relational significance of the human-animal bond, emphasizing its impact on health and well-being across the life course (Pachana et al., 2011). The bond's evolution reflects a deeper understanding of the mutual benefits it provides, fostering a more holistic approach to health and wellness that includes both humans and animals (Walsh, 2009; Oosthuizen et al., 2023).

3 The Role of the Human-Animal Bond in Pet Health

3.1. Influence on pet behavior and well-being

The HAB has been shown to have a profound impact on the behavior and overall well-being of pets. Pets that share a strong bond with their owners often exhibit improved mental health and coping mechanisms, which can be crucial during recovery periods (Creagan et al., 2015). For instance, the presence of a companion animal has been associated with reduced stress and anxiety in both humans and animals, which can lead to better behavioral outcomes in pets (Oosthuizen et al., 2023). Additionally, the emotional support provided by the HAB can help pets feel more secure and less anxious, which is particularly beneficial during the stressful period of surgical recovery (Carson, 2006; Friedmann and Son, 2009; Dell et al., 2023).

3.2. Impact on the immune system and stress responses

The HAB also plays a critical role in modulating the immune system and stress responses in pets. Research indicates that the presence of a trusted human can lead to physiological changes in pets that enhance their immune function and reduce stress levels. For example, interactions with humans have been shown to lower cortisol levels in pets, which is indicative of reduced stress. This reduction in stress can facilitate a more robust immune response, aiding in quicker and more effective recovery from surgical procedures. Moreover, the emotional support provided by the HAB can help mitigate the negative effects of stress, further promoting healing and recovery.

3.3 Correlation between bond strength and recovery outcomes

The strength of the HAB is directly correlated with recovery outcomes in pets. Stronger bonds are often associated with better health outcomes and faster recovery times. Studies have shown that pets with strong emotional bonds to their owners tend to have better resilience and coping mechanisms, which are crucial during the recovery process (Hill et al., 2020). Additionally, the emotional closeness and intimacy dimensions of the HAB appear to be independent of the species, suggesting that the benefits of a strong bond are universally applicable across different types of pets (Wells, 2019; Ratschen et al., 2020). This highlights the importance of fostering a strong HAB to enhance recovery outcomes in pets undergoing surgical procedures.

4 Surgical Recovery in Pets

4.1 Common surgical procedures in pets

Common surgical procedures in pets include spaying and neutering, dental surgeries, tumor removals, and orthopedic surgeries such as cruciate ligament repair. These procedures are essential for maintaining the health and well-being of pets, preventing diseases, and improving their quality of life. The choice of surgical procedure depends on the specific health needs of the pet and the veterinarian's assessment.

4.2 Factors influencing surgical recovery

Several factors influence the surgical recovery of pets, including psychological variables, the type of surgery performed, the pet's overall health, and the quality of post-operative care. Psychological factors such as anxiety, depression, and stress can significantly impact recovery outcomes. For instance, traits like anxiety and subclinical depression can complicate recovery, while dispositional optimism and low pain expectations can promote healing (Mavros et al., 2011). Additionally, the human-animal bond plays a crucial role in recovery, as the emotional support from owners can positively affect the pet's healing process (Creagan et al, 2015).

4.3 Standard post-operative care and monitoring

Standard post-operative care and monitoring are critical for ensuring successful recovery in pets. This includes providing appropriate pain management, monitoring for signs of infection, and ensuring the pet receives adequate rest and nutrition. Collaboration between veterinary and research professionals is essential to minimize animal pain and distress and to advance the scientific goals of the project (Lee-Parritz et al., 2020). Proper anesthesia and analgesia are also vital components of post-operative care to ensure the pet's comfort and well-being during the recovery period.

5 Impact of the Human-Animal Bond on Surgical Recovery in Pets

5.1 Psychological comfort and reduced stress of pets

The psychological comfort provided by a strong human-animal bond plays a critical role in reducing the stress levels of pets during their recovery from surgery. Stress is a significant factor that can impede recovery, leading to prolonged healing times and complications. Pets that share a deep emotional connection with their owners often exhibit reduced anxiety and fear, which can be particularly beneficial during the post-surgical phase (Halm, 2008). The presence of a familiar and trusted human can create a calming environment, thereby minimizing the stress responses that might otherwise hinder recovery. Research has shown that pets recovering in the presence of their owners tend to have lower cortisol levels, a biological marker of stress, indicating that the emotional support from their human companions can significantly mitigate the stress associated with surgery (Kertes et al., 2017).

5.2 Enhanced compliance with post-operative care

A strong human-animal bond can also enhance compliance with post-operative care, which is crucial for successful recovery. Pets are more likely to accept and cooperate with post-surgical treatments, such as medication administration, wound care, and activity restrictions, when there is a trusting relationship with their owner (Alderson et al., 2018). This bond fosters a sense of safety and reassurance, making pets more willing to follow their owners' guidance. Moreover, owners who are emotionally invested in their pets are more likely to be diligent in following veterinary instructions, ensuring that all aspects of post-operative care are properly managed. Enhanced compliance not only reduces the risk of post-surgical complications but also accelerates the healing process, leading to better overall recovery outcomes.

5.3 Improved physiological healing processes

The human-animal bond has been linked to improved physiological healing processes in pets following surgery. The emotional connection between pets and their owners can positively influence the pets' immune response, which is vital for healing. Studies suggest that the presence of a caring and attentive owner can lead to quicker recovery times due to the enhanced production of oxytocin (Gouin et al., 2010). Poutahidis et al. (2013) found that oxytocin can reduce inflammation and promote tissue repair (Figure 1). Additionally, the bond may encourage better eating and drinking habits in pets post-surgery, ensuring they receive the necessary nutrients to support recovery (Shepherd, 2008). Overall, the human-animal bond acts as a catalyst for physiological healing, providing both emotional and physical benefits that contribute to a more efficient and effective recovery process.

Figure 1 oxytocin-associated mechanism accelerates wound repair (Adapted from Poutahidis et al., 2013) Image caption: (a) Oxytocin-deficient male mice have significantly larger wounds in day 6 after wounding compared to wild-type control mice. Wound margins are delineated with yellow outlines. (b) Impaired wound healing in oxytocin-deficient mice is characterized by delayed re-epithelialization and granulation tissue formation. The mature granulation tissue of control mice is characterized by fibrosis and vessels running perpendicularly to the layers of elongated fibroblasts. In oxytocin-deficient mice there is still edematous (early) granulation tissue with an acute inflammatory component. (c) Oxytocin-deficient mouse wounds show minimal collagen deposition and significantly more (d) neutrophils. (b) Hematoxylin and Eosin. (c) Masson's Trichrome (d). Immunohistochemistry (Diaminobenzidine chromogen, Hematoxylin counterstain). Scale bars (b) = 25 µm; (c) (d) and (e)  = 50 µm (Adapted from Poutahidis et al., 2013)

6 Case Study: The Influence of Human-Animal Bond on Post-Surgical Recovery

6.1 Selected case studies

Case Study 1: Postoperative Recovery in Dogs Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery

This case study involves a group of dogs that underwent complex orthopedic surgery. The recovery environment varied, with some dogs being closely monitored by their owners, while others were cared for in veterinary facilities with limited human interaction. The study emphasizes the importance of adequate space and an enriched environment for recovery and recommends regular human interaction (Dorn, 2017).

Case Study 2: Cats Recovering from Soft Tissue Surgery

This case focuses on cats that underwent soft tissue surgery, comparing those who recovered in the presence of their primary caregivers to those who were in a more isolated environment. During the recovery process after surgery, the presence of a caregiver plays an important role in alleviating postoperative pain and anxiety in cats. The study by Hardie et al. (1997) found that cats exhibited fewer pain-related behaviors when a caregiver was present, especially in the early days following surgery.

Case Study 3: The impact of human interaction on postoperative pain behaviors in rabbits

Rabbits, often considered more sensitive to stress than other pets. This study focuses on postoperative pain behaviors in rabbits after orthopedic surgery. It examines how the presence of an observer (simulating human interaction) influences pain-related behaviors, shedding light on the role of human interaction in recovery. Pinho et al. (2020) observed 28 rabbits undergoing orthopedic surgery, filmed 24 hours before surgery, and 1 hour (before rescue analgesia), 4 hours (3 hours after rescue analgesia), and 24 hours post-recovery were observed in the presence and absence of an observer (Figure 2).

Figure 2 New ICT based fertility management model in private dairy farm India as well as abroad

6.2 Key findings and interpretations

The case studies presented reveal several key findings that underscore the significance of the human-animal bond in the recovery process after surgery.

Across the cases, animals that experienced regular, comforting interactions with their owners showed signs of better pain management. For example, the dogs recovering from orthopedic surgery in a home environment exhibited fewer signs of pain and discomfort compared to those in clinical settings. This suggests that the presence of a trusted human can act as a form of emotional analgesia, reducing perceived pain levels (Dorn, 2017).

The studies highlighted that animals with stronger human bonds tended to have faster recovery times. In cats recovering from soft tissue surgery, those with constant human presence had quicker wound healing and a faster return to normal eating and grooming behaviors. This may be attributed to reduced stress levels and a more relaxed state conducive to healing (Faires et al., 2009).

The overarching theme from these case studies is that pets with a strong human-animal bond not only recover more quickly but also maintain a higher quality of life during the recovery period. This includes better appetite, less aggressive behavior, and a greater willingness to engage in normal activities, all of which are indicators of improved well-being.

These findings emphasize the critical role of the human-animal bond in promoting faster and more effective recovery in pets following surgery. The emotional support provided by humans not only aids in pain management and stress reduction but also enhances the overall recovery experience, leading to better outcomes for pets.

7 Challenges and Limitations

7.1 Variability in bond strength and pet personality

One of the primary challenges in assessing the influence of the human-animal bond on post-surgical recovery is the variability in bond strength between different pets and their owners. The human-animal bond is not a uniform concept; it can range from strong, deeply emotional connections to more functional, utilitarian relationships. Pets with a strong bond to their owners may experience greater emotional support, which can positively influence their recovery. However, pets with weaker bonds may not benefit as much, leading to inconsistent outcomes across studies. Additionally, the personality of the pet plays a significant role in how they respond to human interaction during recovery. Some pets are naturally more social and responsive to human care, while others may be more independent or stressed by excessive attention, which can complicate the generalization of findings (Schoenfeld-Tacher et al., 2010; Hill et al., 2020).

7.2 Influence of owner’s emotional state on recovery

The emotional state of the owner is another critical factor that can influence the pet’s recovery process. Owners who are calm, positive, and emotionally stable are likely to provide a more supportive and stress-free environment for their recovering pets. In contrast, owners who are anxious, stressed, or emotionally unstable may inadvertently transfer these negative emotions to their pets, potentially hindering recovery. This transference of emotions can affect the pet's stress levels, immune response, and overall healing process, adding a layer of complexity to the relationship between the human-animal bond and recovery outcomes.

7.3 Limitations of current research

Despite the growing interest in the human-animal bond's impact on surgical recovery, current research is limited by several factors. Many studies rely on small sample sizes, which may not be representative of the broader pet population. Additionally, there is often a lack of standardized metrics to measure the strength of the human-animal bond and its direct effects on recovery, leading to inconsistencies in findings (Packman et al., 2011). Moreover, much of the existing research is observational, making it difficult to establish causality between the bond and recovery outcomes. There is also a need for more longitudinal studies that track the long-term effects of the human-animal bond on post-surgical recovery. Without addressing these limitations, it remains challenging to draw definitive conclusions and apply findings broadly across different species and contexts.

8 Future Directions

8.1 Need for longitudinal studies

To fully understand the long-term effects of the human-animal bond on surgical recovery in pets, there is a pressing need for longitudinal studies. These studies would allow researchers to track the progress and outcomes of pets over extended periods, providing valuable insights into how sustained human-animal interactions influence recovery trajectories. Longitudinal research can help identify specific factors that contribute to improved recovery and overall well-being, thereby informing better clinical practices and interventions (Lee-Parritz, 2020).

8.2 Exploring the role of technological interventions

Technological advancements offer promising avenues for enhancing the human-animal bond and improving surgical recovery outcomes. For instance, telemedicine platforms can facilitate continuous monitoring and support for pets post-surgery, ensuring timely interventions and reducing stress for both pets and their owners. Additionally, wearable devices that track vital signs and activity levels can provide real-time data to veterinarians, enabling more personalized and effective care plans. The integration of such technologies could revolutionize post-operative care and significantly enhance recovery experiences (Campoy, 2022).

8.3 Integrating human-animal bonding in veterinary care protocols

Incorporating the principles of the human-animal bond into standard veterinary care protocols could lead to more holistic and effective treatment strategies. This integration would involve training veterinary professionals to recognize and leverage the therapeutic potential of human-animal interactions during the recovery process. Protocols could include guidelines for encouraging owner involvement in post-operative care, structured bonding activities, and stress-reduction techniques tailored to individual pets. By formalizing these practices, veterinary care can become more attuned to the emotional and psychological needs of pets, thereby promoting faster and more complete recoveries (Lee-Parritz, 2020; Campoy, 2022).

9 Concluding Remarks

This study has explored the intricate relationship between the human-animal bond and its influence on surgical recovery in pets. The evidence indicates that the presence of a caregiver significantly impacts postoperative recovery, reducing pain-related behaviors, and enhancing overall well-being. Specifically, studies have shown that animals recovering in familiar environments with their caregivers exhibit faster recovery rates and lower stress levels compared to those without such support. The bond between pets and their owners plays a crucial role in both the physical and emotional aspects of recovery, highlighting the importance of considering this dynamic in postoperative care.

The findings from this study have important implications for veterinary practice. Veterinary professionals should recognize the value of involving pet owners in the recovery process, not only to provide emotional support but also to facilitate a more comfortable and stress-free environment for the animal. Encouraging pet owners to remain present during critical recovery periods, and educating them on how to effectively care for their pets post-surgery, can lead to improved outcomes. Additionally, veterinarians might consider developing protocols that integrate the human-animal bond as a therapeutic component in postoperative care, potentially offering guidelines for how pet owners can best support their animals during recovery.

The human-animal bond is a profound and multifaceted relationship that extends beyond companionship, playing a critical role in the health and recovery of pets. This bond not only affects the psychological well-being of pets but also has tangible effects on their physical recovery from surgery. As veterinary medicine continues to advance, it is essential to integrate an understanding of this bond into both clinical practice and research. By acknowledging and harnessing the power of the human-animal bond, veterinary professionals can improve postoperative care and contribute to the overall health and happiness of pets and their owners alike.

Acknowledgments

AnimalSci Publisher thanks the two anonymous peer reviewers for their thorough review of this study and for their suggestions for improvement.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Alderson B., Pettitt R., and Dale L., 2018, Postoperative management and rehabilitation, BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2nd edition, pp. 241-251.

https://doi.org/10.22233/9781910443286.17

Beck A., 2014, The biology of the human-animal bond, Animal Frontiers, 4: 32-36.

https://doi.org/10.2527/AF.2014-0019

Borgi M., and Cirulli F., 2016, Pet face: mechanisms underlying human-animal relationships, Frontiers in Psychology, 7: 298.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00298

Campoy L., 2022, Development of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in veterinary medicine through a one-health approach: the role of anesthesia and locoregional techniques, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 1-9.

https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.22.08.0354

PMid:36301954

Carson L., 2006, The animal/human bond, American Journal of Health Education, 37: 361-365.

https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2006.10598928

Creagan E., Bauer B., Thomley B., and Borg J., 2015, Animal-assisted therapy at mayo clinic: the time is now, Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 21(2): 101-104.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2015.03.002

Dell C., Kosteniuk B., Doi C., Chalmers D., and Butt P., 2023, The role of the human-canine bond in recovery from substance use disorder: A scoping review and narrative synthesis protocol, Human-Animal Interactions

https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2023.0029

Dorn M., 2017, Crate confinement of dogs following orthopaedic surgery, Part 2: practical recovery area considerations, Companion Animal, 22: 604-613.

https://doi.org/10.12968/COAN.2017.22.10.604

Friedmann E., and Son H., 2009, The human-companion animal bond: how humans benefit, The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Small Animal Practice, 39(2): 293-326.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2008.10.015

PMid:19185195

Gee N., Mueller M., and Curl A., 2017, Human-animal interaction and older adults: An overview, Frontiers in Psychology, 8: 1416.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01416

PMid:28878715

Gouin J., Stowell J., Carter C., Pournajafi-Nazarloo H., Glasser R., Malarkey W., Loving T., and Kiecolt-Glaser J., 2010, Marital behavior, oxytocin, vasopressin, and wound healing, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35: 1082-1090.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.01.009

PMid:20144509

Halm M., 2008, The healing power of the human-animal connection, American Journal of Critical Care: an Official Publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, 17(4): 373-376.

https://doi.org/10.4037/AJCC2008.17.4.373

PMid:18593884

Hardie E., Hansen B., and Carroll G., 1997, Behavior after ovariohysterectomy in the dog: what's normal?, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 51: 111-128.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01078-7

Hill L., Winefield H., and Bennett P., 2020, Are stronger bonds better? examining the relationship between the human-animal bond and human social support, and its impact on resilience, Australian Psychologist, 55: 729-738.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12466

Kertes D., Liu J., Hall N., Hadad N., Wynne C., and Bhatt S., 2017, Effect of pet dogs on children's perceived stress and cortisol stress response, Social Development, 26(2): 382-401.

https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12203

PMid: 28439150

Lee-Parritz D., 2020, Animal surgery and care of animals, Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine, 4th edition, pp. 899-916.

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-087780-8.00056-5

Mavros M., Athanasiou S., Gkegkes I., Polyzos K., Peppas G., and Falagas M., 2011, Do psychological variables affect early surgical recovery?, PLoS ONE, 6: e20306.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020306

PMid:21673929

Oosthuizen K., Haase B., Ravulo J., Lomax S., and Ma G., 2023, The role of human-animal bonds for people experiencing crisis situations, Animals: an Open Access Journal from MDPI, 13: 941

https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13050941

Oosthuizen K., Haase B., Ravulo J., Lomax S., and Ma G., 2023, The role of human-animal bonds for people experiencing crisis situations, Animals: an Open Access Journal from MDPI, 13: 941.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13050941

PMid:36987522

Overgaauw P., Vinke C., Hagen M., and Lipman L., 2020, A one health perspective on the human-companion animal relationship with emphasis on zoonotic aspects, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17: 3789.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113789

PMid:32466459

Pachana N., Massavelli B., and Robleda-Gomez S., 2011, A developmental psychological perspective on the human-animal bond, 151-165.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9761-6_9

Packman W., Field N., Carmack B., and Ronen R., 2011, Continuing bonds and psychosocial adjustment in pet loss, Journal of Loss and Trauma, 16: 341-357.

https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2011.572046

Pinho R., Leach M., Minto B., Rocha F., and Luna S., 2020, Postoperative pain behaviours in rabbits following orthopaedic surgery and effect of observer presence, PLoS ONE, 15: e0240605.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240605

PMid:35636454

Poutahidis T., Kearney S., Levkovich T., Qi P., Varian B., Lakritz J., Ibrahim Y., Chatzigiagkos A., Alm E., and Erdman S., 2013, Microbial symbionts accelerate wound healing via the neuropeptide hormone oxytocin, PLoS ONE, 8: e78898.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078898

Ratschen E., Shoesmith E., Shahab L., Silva K., Kale D., Toner P., Reeve C., and Mills D., 2020, Human-animal relationships and interactions during the Covid-19 lockdown phase in the UK: Investigating links with mental health and loneliness, PLoS ONE, 15: e0239397.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239397

PMid:25892385

Schoenfeld-Tacher R., Kogan L., and Wright M., 2010, Comparison of strength of the human-animal bond between Hispanic and non-Hispanic owners of pet dogs and cats, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 236(5): 529-534.

https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.236.5.529

PMid:20187820

Shepherd K., 2008, The role of the companion animal veterinary surgeon in behavioural husbandry, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 50(1): 12-12.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S12

PMid:18474062

Walsh F., 2009, Human-animal bonds I: the relational significance of companion animals, Family Process, 48(4): 462-480.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01296.x

PMid:19930406

Wells D., 2019, The State of Research on Human-Animal Relations: Implications for Human Health, Anthrozoös, 32: 169-181.

https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1569902